.cate the order at once with a copy of judgment for information and necessary action to all respondents. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (HCD) (2009) 638; 15 MLR (HCD) (2010) 1.cate the order at once with a copy of judgment for information and necessary action to all respondents. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (HCD) (2009) 638; 15 MLR (HCD) (2010) 1.dalat No.
Apr 2, 2017 - অর্থঋণ আদালত, artha rin adalat ain 2003 with amendment, artha rin adalat. Rin adalat ain 2003 pdf download, money loan court act 2003 english. Artha Rin Adalat Ain 2003 Bangladesh Pdf. 2/19/2018 0 Comments Jun 13, 2012 This series known as ‘Laws of Bangladesh’ is. The Artha Rin Adalat Ain (ARAA) 2003 has. However, if that financial provision files a case in Artha Rin Adalat for recovering loans, then the ARAA will be applicable [section 5(6) of ARAA].
1 Rajbari and others.Respondents Judgment November 5, 2008. Result: The Rule is made absolute without any order as to cost. The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Act No. VIII of 2003) Whether the provisions of civil imprisonment under section 3. Category: Civil Law Date: 5 Nov, 2008 Hits: 170.sult, the Rule is discharged without any order as to cost. The order of stay granted earlier by this Court stands vacated.
This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 911.sult, the Rule is discharged without any order as to cost. The order of stay granted earlier by this Court stands vacated. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 911. Not being a guarantor or mortgagor of the loan for recovery of which the Artha Rin Suit No.470 of 2004 was filed, the Adalat (respondent No.1) acted without jurisdiction under section 5(1) of the Ain, 2003 in proceeding ag ainst the petitioner-bank and in passing the impugned ex parts judgment a. Category: Civil Law Date: 17 Jun, 2008 Hits: 9.d with cost. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit preferably within three months from the date of receipt of the order.
This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 572.d with cost. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit preferably within three months from the date of receipt of the order. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 572.16-2-2005 passed by Artha Rin Adalat, Natore (Respondent No.2) in Artha Rin Adalat Case No.40 of 2004 rejecting the application of the petitioner filed under section 17(1) (2) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 and also exempting the pl aintiff in filing the documents.
The respondent No.4, Bank. Category: Civil Law Date: 24 Apr, 2008 Hits: 65.r before the Artha Rin Adalat concerned within 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment by that Adalat. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 64.r before the Artha Rin Adalat concerned within 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment by that Adalat. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 64.ng for the writ petitioners has assailed the impugned order on the m ain ground that before passing of this order the provision of sub-section (5), (6) and (7) of Section 33 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 were not complied with.
Asad Hoss ain Chowdhury, the learned advocate, appeari. Category: Civil Law Date: 11 Sep, 2007 Hits: 6.tent of 25% of the decretal dues in default the Miscellaneous Case shall stand rejected. Communicate the order at once.
This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 64.tent of 25% of the decretal dues in default the Miscellaneous Case shall stand rejected. Communicate the order at once.
This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 64. Judge and Artharin Adalat No.1, Dhaka and othersRespondents Judgment December 15, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Act No. VIII of 2003); section 32 Furnishing of security under section 32 (2) of.
Category: Civil Law Date: 15 Dec, 2005 Hits: 19.y to issue necessary order for auction sale and/or civil warrant of arrest etc after compliance of the provisions of law. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 245.y to issue necessary order for auction sale and/or civil warrant of arrest etc after compliance of the provisions of law.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 245.ip;Respondents Judgment August 11, 2003. Result: The Rule is made absolute.
Under section 5(4) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, Artha Rin Adalat is a Civil Court having all the powers and jurisdiction under the Civil Proced. Category: Civil Law Date: 11 Aug, 2003 Hits: 26.
With the aforesaid findings and observations, the writ petition is summarily disposed of, without any order as to costs. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (HCD) (2010) 69.decree. With the aforesaid findings and observations, the writ petition is summarily disposed of, without any order as to costs. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (HCD) (2010) 69.ranted to the borrower Sonargaon Dying process and Finishing Mills Ltd. Represented by its Managing Director late Md.
Akhtarazzaman Khan and as such, according to Section 6(5) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 the mortgaged properties of the borrower requires to be sold first for the purpose of real. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 38. In the result, the appeal is dismissed and the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Chowdhury ATM Masud J.- I agree.
This Case is also Reported in:35 DLR (HCD) (1983) 293. In the result, the appeal is dismissed and the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Chowdhury ATM Masud J.- I agree. This Case is also Reported in:35 DLR (HCD) (1983) 293.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed and the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Chowdhury ATM Masud J.- I agree.
This Case is also Reported in:35 DLR (HCD) (1983) 293. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 125.on granted by this Court in C. Rule No.613 (P.M.5/2003 stands vacated.
Communicate this Judgment to the Adalat concerned at once. This Case is also Reported in: 17 MLR (HCD) (2012) 444.on granted by this Court in C. Rule No.613 (P.M.5/2003 stands vacated. Communicate this Judgment to the Adalat concerned at once. This Case is also Reported in: 17 MLR (HCD) (2012) 444. Application (appellant) for one month time to deposit 25% of the bid money.
![Adalat Adalat](/uploads/1/2/5/3/125357385/329583227.jpg)
He next submits that the executing Court without exhausting the mandatory provisions of section 33 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 and section 82-86 of the Code of Civil Procedure allowed the 4th highest bidder to deposit. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 145.Ain is to be followed before taking action under section 34 (1) of the Ain. Communicate the Judgment to respondent No.1 at once. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 435.Ain is to be followed before taking action under section 34 (1) of the Ain. Communicate the Judgment to respondent No.1 at once.
This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 435.cution case is within time. Notice was published for auction sale of the mortgaged property in the execution case. At one stage, the Bank filed an application under section 34 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (the Ain, in brief) for Civil jail/Civil custody and warrant of arrest ag ainst the Judgm. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 161.ccordance with law. Office is directed to communicate the order at once with a copy of judgment of information and necessary action.
This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (HCD) (2009) 791.ccordance with law. Office is directed to communicate the order at once with a copy of judgment of information and necessary action. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (HCD) (2009) 791.ecution in Artha Execution Case No.60 of 2006.
The bank tried to sell the mortgaged property in auction by complying with Provisions of law laid down in section 33(1)(2)(3)(4) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain 2003 (briefly as Ain 2003) but no bidder participated in the bid. Then the bank filed an applica. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 139.cipality or union every when and then except in due process of law. Thus the Rule is disposed of with the above observations. Mohammad Bazlur Rahman J. This Case is also Reported in:.cipality or union every when and then except in due process of law. Thus the Rule is disposed of with the above observations.
Mohammad Bazlur Rahman J. This Case is also Reported in:.4223 of 2004.
Ruhul Quddus J. This Rule nisi was issued calling in question a notification published in Bangladesh Gazette extraordinary dated 10.6.2004 being S.R.O. No.191 Ain/2004 communicated with a covering letter as cont ained in Memo No.Poura-3/Cha-Bi-Ga-36/98/674 dat. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 131.ared to have been passed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and hereby set aside. Communicate this order at once.
This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 417.ared to have been passed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and hereby set aside. Communicate this order at once.
This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 417.d passed by the learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka in Artha Execution Case No.195 of 2007 issuing warrant of arrest (Annexure-B) in violation of Section 34 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 and Order XXI Rule 37 and section 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall not be passed wi. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 135.ith the execution case in accordance with law. The order of stay stands vacated. Communicate the Judgment to the Adalat at once. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 78.ith the execution case in accordance with law.
The order of stay stands vacated. Communicate the Judgment to the Adalat at once. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 78.pplication by the impugned order dated 10-2-2004 on the ground that the petitioner did not deposit 25% of the decretal amount in accordance with the provision of section 32(2) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (shortly stated as the Ain) and so the application is not m aint ainable. In the backd.
Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 138. Surrender before the Artha Rin Adalat concerned within 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment by that Adalat. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 283. Surrender before the Artha Rin Adalat concerned within 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment by that Adalat. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 283.aring for the writ petitioners has assailed the impugned order on the m ain ground that before passing of the order the provisions of sub-section (5), (6) and (7) of Section 33 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 were not complied with. Asad Hoss ain Chowdhury, the learned advocate appearing f. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 71.ischarged without any order as to cost.
The order of stay stands vacated. Communicate the judgment to respondent No.2 at once. This Case is also Reported in: 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 359.ischarged without any order as to cost. The order of stay stands vacated.
Communicate the judgment to respondent No.2 at once. This Case is also Reported in: 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 359.he judgment debtors having failed to pay the decretal amount, the Bank on 14.3.2001 filed Title execution case no 24 of 2001 for execution of the decree and after promulgation of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain 2003 the said execution case was renumbered as Artha Jari case No.488 of 2003 before the Artha R. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 86.is directed to dispose of the suit within 3(three) months from the date of receipt of this order in the interest of all the parties. This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 133.is directed to dispose of the suit within 3(three) months from the date of receipt of this order in the interest of all the parties.
This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 133.ts were overlooked by the Trial Court in granting the order of status quo. The learned Advocate further submits that the impugned order also offends the provision of section 37 of the Arthorin Adalat Ain inasmuch as a time frame has been given by the Parliament for executing a decree of Arthorin Ada. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 94. The stay order stands vacated. Send copy of this judgment to the Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court, Jessore.
Nozrul Islam Chowdhury J.-I agree. This Case is also Reported in:.as to cost.
The stay order stands vacated. Send copy of this judgment to the Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court, Jessore.
Nozrul Islam Chowdhury J.-I agree. This Case is also Reported in:. To show that the judgment and decree suffers from without jurisdiction or in other words coram non judice or out come or fraud committed on court. (21) Artha Rin Adalat Ain and the Writ Jurisdiction The judgment and decree of the Artha Rin Adalat cannot be int.
Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 254. Of stay granted earlier by the Court stands vacated. No order as to costs.
Communicate the Judgment to respondent No.1 at once. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 91. Of stay granted earlier by the Court stands vacated. No order as to costs. Communicate the Judgment to respondent No.1 at once.
This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 91.ppeared in that suit and filed an application for rejection the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short, the Code) read with sections 46 and 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (the Ain, in short) stating that the suit is barred by limitation under section 46 of the. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 176.t of this order positively and ensure the compliance to the Registrar of the Supreme Court without any fail. Communicate at once. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 487.t of this order positively and ensure the compliance to the Registrar of the Supreme Court without any fail.
Communicate at once. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 487.ny filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the ground that the aforesaid case is barred by limitation as per provision of section 46 (1) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Annexure-G).The Artha Rin Adalat respondent No.1 by impugned order dated rejec. Category: Civil Law Date: Hits: 108.